• Victor
    link
    English
    41 month ago

    So what is this? Some kind of anti masturbation law?

    • @MothmanDelorian
      link
      English
      121 month ago

      In a statement to WLBT News, Blackmon wrote, “All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation.

      This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.”

      The article is very short.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        Short article, yet you failed to include the third that makes it illegal to jerk it:

        “As written by Sen. Bradford Blackmon, the bill would make it “unlawful for a person to discharge genetic material without the intent to fertilize an embryo.””

        • @nepenthes
          link
          English
          41 month ago

          Because it’s SATIRE!!

          If anyone is unsure-- look the senator up, he’s a Democrat.

        • @MothmanDelorian
          link
          English
          01 month ago

          That’s because thos is ax stunt to highlight how often antiabortion laws are antiwoman

      • @werefreeatlast
        link
        English
        31 month ago

        My article is 12 inches and very girthy actually, thank you! There used to be a surgeon in California to help you all with short articles. Sadly, you know, the fires…

      • Victor
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        Controlling how adult people practice sex now, eh. Boy, I sure hope all these Trump voters are very happy now.

    • @WordBox
      link
      English
      41 month ago

      It took me less time to find out what this was about than to make this response.

      • @Buddahriffic
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        Careful, stroking your ego like that puts you at risk of violating this law.

      • Victor
        link
        English
        01 month ago

        O… kay. Was I correct? I tried interpreting the rules listed in the link and drew a conclusion about what they’re trying to achieve. 🤷‍♂️ Thanks for trying to help, good buddy.

        • @WordBox
          link
          English
          026 days ago

          If you’re not interested enough to read why bother asking

          • Victor
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            25 days ago

            I tried interpreting the rules listed in the link and drew a conclusion

            This is what I said. Did you read that part? I did read it, I’m just not certain what the real agenda is behind this ridiculous nonsense.

            You’ve made two replies now wasting your energy by being rude instead of helping. Is this how you treat people you meet in person as well? Sheesh, bro.

            Also your question makes no sense. I’m “not interested” yet I’m still asking? Who would ask if they’re not interested? That makes no sense. Just like someone replying with rude shit instead of helping. That also makes zero sense.

      • Victor
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        Absolutely ridiculous, is what it is. Everybody does it.