It’s not the same at all. A little human girl in a cartoon is still a little human girl. You show me one real mouse that looks like Mickey.
Again, is being into centaur sex being into bestiality? Or can we acknowledge the fact that fictional creatures are not the same as real ones?
People actually into bestiality help perpetuate animal cruelty. Lumping the people into anthropomorphic animal sex in cartoons into that group is really unfair and unkind to them just because you don’t approve of their specific kink.
Yes I’d say centaur sex is beastiality. It’s not a human. Drawing represent things. Just as you said a drawing of a little is still a little girl. A drawing of an animal is still an animal.
I’m not going to give anyone a pass because it’s “anthropomorphic”. That’s a cop out.
Yet again, show me a mouse that looks or even acts like Mickey. You keep avoiding the fact that what they are into are not animals, they’re mythical creatures.
Until you can show some evidence that what they are actually into is real animals that actually exist then you are just doing the “pedophiles are gay” thing.
I never said pedophiles are gay. I said they are pedophiles. Whether the mouse looks like Mickey doesn’t matter. If it’s being sexual then it’s beastiality.
Anywhoo Im done with this conversation. I will noy be responding back again.
It’s not the same at all. A little human girl in a cartoon is still a little human girl. You show me one real mouse that looks like Mickey.
Again, is being into centaur sex being into bestiality? Or can we acknowledge the fact that fictional creatures are not the same as real ones?
People actually into bestiality help perpetuate animal cruelty. Lumping the people into anthropomorphic animal sex in cartoons into that group is really unfair and unkind to them just because you don’t approve of their specific kink.
Yes I’d say centaur sex is beastiality. It’s not a human. Drawing represent things. Just as you said a drawing of a little is still a little girl. A drawing of an animal is still an animal.
I’m not going to give anyone a pass because it’s “anthropomorphic”. That’s a cop out.
Again- people actually into bestiality are promoting animal cruelty. These people are not. I have no idea why you can’t see the difference.
It can not promote animal cruelty and still be disgusting. It doesn’t need to be I/0.
But anyways, I don’t want to spend my morning talking anymore about this subject.
Whether or not you personally find it disgusting and whether or not it is the same as bestiality are two very different things.
This is uncomfortably close to “men who sexually assault little boys” is a subset of homosexuality. It is not.
I disagree. If someone wanks to drawings of little boys, they are a pedophile.
Yet again, show me a mouse that looks or even acts like Mickey. You keep avoiding the fact that what they are into are not animals, they’re mythical creatures.
Until you can show some evidence that what they are actually into is real animals that actually exist then you are just doing the “pedophiles are gay” thing.
I never said pedophiles are gay. I said they are pedophiles. Whether the mouse looks like Mickey doesn’t matter. If it’s being sexual then it’s beastiality.
Anywhoo Im done with this conversation. I will noy be responding back again.
Yes, that is my point.
Similarly, by this “furries are bestialists” logic, BDSM and sexual assault are the same thing. I hope you don’t believe that.