• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 days ago

    Yeah, the non aggression pact, trying to save what was left of Poland. (Guess where the Jewish people fled?) Its not like it was the only country(which unlike others, had reasons, tsarist regime and the civil war are not great for neither the army nor people) which was wishing to isolate itself from expanding Nazi Germany, not like US was neutral(and the businesses were allied) regarding Nazi Germany till last moment. And no, Germany did not pay a heavy price, just the rhetoric about Muslims in the German politics today can say that.

    Also, I would like to mention, the fight against Fascism was done by the SOVIET PEOPLE, not only by Russians (my human waves!!!), this alone says a lot about your knowledge of history…

    • @Gammelfisch
      link
      English
      -116 hours ago

      Ask the Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians and especially the Suomi how they feel about the fucking Soviets. November 1939, the Russians attacked Finland and in 1940 they took the Baltic states. Stalin was hell bent on illegally occupying Europe and they were not going to repeat their 1920 failure when Poland stopped them on the Vistula (Wisla) River. The Russians and surprisingly, the Austrians, got away with it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -116 hours ago

      Yeah, the non aggression pact

      Think he meant the invasion of poland that you’re using the official name for to pretend wasn’t an invasion done by both the soviet’s and Nazis. Liiiitle more extreme to work directly with them in invading the country where the worst of the camps were actually built then you’re implying here

      this alone says a lot about your knowledge of history

    • @makyo
      link
      English
      21 day ago

      As I said in another thread: the Nazis absolutely paid the price - they were subjected to war crimes trials, had their regime disassembled, and their country carved up and occupied by the allied powers for decades. How is that not a heavy price?

      Meanwhile the USSR was subjected to nothing of the sort - it was actually the opposite, they were allowed to keep and drain the resources of all their conquored territories (even those unrelated to the Nazi regime).

      • Log in | Sign up
        link
        English
        11 day ago

        True, but also the allies decided that war reparations had been a bad idea that helped the rise of the Nazis and instead of trying to extract a monetary penalty, they decided that investing in and supporting West Germany was the best plan for peace and international harmony. They were right, but it didn’t half make West Germany an economic powerhouse of Europe, especially because they didn’t spend any government money on the military because they weren’t allowed to have one.

        Meanwhile the USSR faced economic sanctions.

        So yes, absolutely you’re right about Germany, but it’s more than a little bit imbalanced to suggest that the second half of the twentieth century was characterised by sweetness and light towards the USSR hand brutal repression of Germany. It wasn’t like that at all.

        • @makyo
          link
          English
          11 day ago

          Definitely wasn’t implying the USSR was treated sweetly, though I was under the impression sanctions toward them were all the result if their post war actions - i.e. not cooperating with the allies’ post war agreements. You may be more familiar with that than I am though.

    • OBJECTION!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Also, Britain and France signed a non-agression pact with the Nazis too, and not only that, they sold out Czechoslovakia (who they were allied to) in exchange! Meanwhile, the Soviets had previously sought agreements with them against the Nazis which were rejected.