• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    275 days ago

    NJ had a single use plastic bag tax. To get around it companies increased the thickness of plastic bags and gave it for free. Apparently the thickness is what separated a single use bag with a reusable one. Politicians are clowns 🤡.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It’s supposed to be a game of cat and mouse, but right now the cat isn’t even trying. I think what’s needed is some sort of ‘living legislation’ that constantly updates to close loopholes that stakeholders find in it. Iirc this should be possible in common law systems with deliberately vague laws whose interpretation keeps getting updated by court cases.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        65 days ago

        Wasn’t that the idea behing the Chevron doctrine? Leave the specifics up to experts rather than bamboozling Congresscritters about details.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 days ago

      Same up in Connecticut. I have so many crappy “reusable” plastic bags from Target pickup orders during the height of the pandemic. I can’t bring myself to get rid of them because they’re “reusable”, so I use them to hold donations for the thrift store and get rid of them that way. I also use them as packing material.

      I have other, nicer bags I use when I go to shopping.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      44 days ago

      Politicians are clowns is what you said while it was companies skirting the spirit of the law by exploiting a loophole.

      Amazing that is your take

    • @AlternatePersonMan
      link
      14 days ago

      I would envision a plastic tax that is based on weight of the material created. Every ounce costs $.10.Make the producer last. Same with Styrofoam. That money could be funneled back to some green initiative.