• federal reverseM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 days ago

    And it was the USA along with Britain (and Europe) that stopped it within their own countries, is Africa incapable of doing the same hundreds of years after others?

    You may find that most Africans states are not all that old and you may also find that there are postcolonial relationships between EU and African countries. As in, we’re still sucking these countries dry and aren’t providing all that much in return.

    Why is it that the EU has to have its companies go through and search through its supply chains all over the world to find irregularities and report on them and no one else does?

    Yikes. Because we subscribe to certain values, such as the declaration of human rights. Possibly also because global inequalities create massive migration streams.

    • ikt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 days ago

      Because we subscribe to certain values, such as the declaration of human rights.

      and no one else does? just Europe?

      • federal reverseM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 days ago

        Mostly, it seems. The UK is no longer part of the EU and it was the first to prescribe companies create a Anti-Slavery Policy (afaik, that law is toothless though).

        I don’t think whether the EU is the only (or just the first!) bloc to enact a supply-chain transparency law is an argument against such a law at all though. Especially given the connectedness and trade power of the EU, such a law can do a great deal, even if it is enacted only in this part of the world.