• @_stranger_
    link
    English
    32 days ago

    Did this pregnant woman give birth to a child in the past, and is she looking to have that child assassinated in this scenario? That’s covered under regular old murder laws.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -22 days ago

      I am talking about before a woman gives birth to a baby, whether she is 4 weeks pregnant, or 3 month pregnant, and she wants to murder the baby inside of her before she gives birth.

      • @_stranger_
        link
        English
        22 days ago

        That’s called an abortion, not murder. See, since it’s inside of a human with her own agency, no one else has any say in what she does. It’s a very simple concept called bodily autonomy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -22 days ago

          Bodily autonomy of the person inside her during pregnany. If she does not want to be pregnant then she must remain celibate and never be with any man.

          • @_stranger_
            link
            English
            12 days ago

            The fetus is not a person, not a body.

            You don’t get to tell the woman what to do with her body any more than she gets to tell you what to do with yours.

          • Tar_Alcaran
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 days ago

            Bodily autonomy of the person inside her during pregnany.

            Even if we hold that a fetus is a person, that person is not having their bodily autonomy violated.

            Even if we hold that abortion is murder, it is still morally right, because the right to bodily autonomy is more important than the right to life.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 day ago

              The right to life is the supreme law and rule. Everything else is secondary, including bodily autonomy is secondary to the right to life. During pregnancg, the lifeof the baby is most important. The mother has already lived her life, she decided to mess around and get pregnant, the baby must be protected at all cost during pregnancy because the baby has not had a chance at it’s right to life yet, so the baby’s life comes first, the mother’s life is seconday.

              She should never been with a man if she was not willing to sacrifice her own life and put the life of the child insider of her as first priority, she comes second.

              • Tar_Alcaran
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 day ago

                The right to life is the supreme law and rule. Everything else is secondary, including bodily autonomy

                So, why aren’t we forcing people to donate blood? Or organs? Why can’t we take half your liver, against your will, to save someone else?