@vegeta to TechnologyEnglish • 9 days agoDeepSeek's AI breakthrough bypasses industry-standard CUDA, uses assembly-like PTX programming insteadwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square41arrow-up1340arrow-down113cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1327arrow-down1external-linkDeepSeek's AI breakthrough bypasses industry-standard CUDA, uses assembly-like PTX programming insteadwww.tomshardware.com@vegeta to TechnologyEnglish • 9 days agomessage-square41cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-29 days agoIt certainly does. Until last week, you absolutely NEEDED an NVidia GPU equipped with CUDA to run all AI models. Today, that is simply not true. (watch the video at the end of this comment) I watched this video and my initial reaction to this news was validated and then some: this video made me even more bearish on NVDA. Edit: corrected and redacted.
minus-squareEager EaglelinkEnglish6•edit-29 days agomate, that means they are using PTX directly. If anything, they are more dependent to NVIDIA and the CUDA platform than anyone else. to simplify: they are bypassing the CUDA API, not the NVIDIA instruction set architecture and not CUDA as a platform.
minus-squareEager EaglelinkEnglish5•edit-29 days ago Until last week, you absolutely NEEDED an NVidia GPU equipped with CUDA to run all AI models. also not true
It certainly does.Until last week, you absolutely NEEDED an NVidia GPU equipped with CUDA to run all AI models.Today, that is simply not true. (watch the video at the end of this comment)I watched this video and my initial reaction to this news was validated and then some: this video made me even more bearish on NVDA.Edit: corrected and redacted.
mate, that means they are using PTX directly. If anything, they are more dependent to NVIDIA and the CUDA platform than anyone else.
to simplify: they are bypassing the CUDA API, not the NVIDIA instruction set architecture and not CUDA as a platform.
Ahh. Thanks for this insight.
also not true
Thanks for the corrections.