• Björn Tantau
    link
    fedilink
    2315 hours ago

    My boss once asked me whether their entrance test was too hard after several candidates sent him something that wouldn’t even run.

      • mosiacmango
        link
        fedilink
        1715 hours ago

        Should working code even be part of an interview? Seems like a situation rife with abuse.

        Need free contractors? Just put your code issues up as a 4hr take home interview test.

        • Karyoplasma
          link
          fedilink
          1614 hours ago

          Pseudocode/general thought process walkthrough should be the only thing imo. Oh no, the interviewee forgot a semicolon, so he is trash at coding and is a no-fit is complete bullshit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          513 hours ago

          how the applicant thinks breaks down problems and handles how to answer them matters more than if the code is actually functional on the spot

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        48 hours ago

        Classic write-up!

        Although, now that I’m an interviewer, I kind of despise FizzBuzz, because nobody thinks clearly during a high pressure interview.

        Whenever possible, I love to talk with a candidate about some concrete past source code they claim to have written. I’ve better luck putting the candidate at ease and then talking through their contributions to the code.

        Of course, when I get enough candidates who shared source code, I don’t even invite the ones who didn’t share source code for an interview.

    • Cousin Mose
      link
      fedilink
      513 hours ago

      I thought my entrance test was far too easy, I only had to create a blog in my web framework and show doing the basics like validations, secure parameters, etc.

      I learned later on that most couldn’t pass because they came from other languages and thought they could get by without knowing anything.