qazM to [email protected]English • edit-215 hours agoTariffsimagemessage-square67arrow-up1329arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1323arrow-down1imageTariffsqazM to [email protected]English • edit-215 hours agomessage-square67file-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•5 hours agoNo it would not. It would be a wake up call for the senate to pull back the power of POTUS if anything.
minus-square@MothmanDelorianlinkEnglish0•4 hours agoYes, it would because you have a candidate going out of their way to prevent a fair election from happening. This is intro level poli sci stuff that you are not getting here
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 hours agoMore like resetting the election forcing both parties to pick new candidates.
minus-square@MothmanDelorianlinkEnglish0•2 hours agoWhich we don’t do either unless there is demonstrable proof that the election was fraudulent and we don’t have. You keep making the authoritarian/dictatorial choice that doesn’t align with the rule of law. Why?
No it would not. It would be a wake up call for the senate to pull back the power of POTUS if anything.
Yes, it would because you have a candidate going out of their way to prevent a fair election from happening.
This is intro level poli sci stuff that you are not getting here
More like resetting the election forcing both parties to pick new candidates.
Which we don’t do either unless there is demonstrable proof that the election was fraudulent and we don’t have.
You keep making the authoritarian/dictatorial choice that doesn’t align with the rule of law. Why?