(This is a parody for all who were unawere)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If you think you have to let murderers free because of democracy, you don’t support democracy, you support murder.

    An investigation ending in a jury trial is not, by any standard, despotic nor authoritarian.

    However refusing to bring charges against someone in your same political class because they ran against you or might do so in the future absolutely is authoritarian and is the sign of an oligarchy wherein those with enough money are free from consequences.

    • @MothmanDelorian
      link
      English
      -11 month ago

      If in 2020 Trump prevented Biden from running would you support that?

        • @MothmanDelorian
          link
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          So if the courts who are the actual constitutional check said Biden could run you would support Trump stopping him?

            • @MothmanDelorian
              link
              English
              -11 month ago

              Im talking about SCOTUS and the federal courts. Those Courts are the check on the executive branch. The executive branch is not the check on itself.

              Even if we were talking about a jury that would still ge part of the courts

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Neither scotus nor the federal courts can bring charges, only oversee trials for said charges, or in the case of scotus, determine whether laws are constitutional and were followed during trial.*

                Therefore the executive, as has always been it’s role would have to bring charges.

                • Obviously courts can bring contempt charges, but only during and after a trial.