In understand cherry picking just fine. You only like the data that fits your narrative and it’s pretty obvious. Any thing doesn’t firt your narrative is “liberal” or an “outlier.” People like you always have excuses when the evidence doesn’t say exactly what you want it to.
Sounds like a lot of mental gymnastics for cherry picking.
Perhaps you don’t understand. That is fine.
In understand cherry picking just fine. You only like the data that fits your narrative and it’s pretty obvious. Any thing doesn’t firt your narrative is “liberal” or an “outlier.” People like you always have excuses when the evidence doesn’t say exactly what you want it to.
Apparently you haven’t followed 538’s articles and compared the models to actual election results.