• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    427 days ago

    Came here to quote that same thing.

    This is insane. If anyone hasn’t yet, cancel your subscriptions.

    LAT should maybe be banned here too. This is editorial not news but, if they’re willing to completely reverse the meaning without acknowledgement or changing attribution, how can we trust a word in that paper? They’ve just discredited everyone who works there.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      107 days ago

      It’s not going to hurt their bottom line, but as a matter of principle I deleted my bookmark for the LAT when their billionaire owner refused to allow the paper to endorse Harris/Walz. So this honestly doesn’t surprise me at all. Just add it to the list of reasons we need to tax billionaires out of existence.