![[Lemmy Social] Join Lemmy istances/communities (share useful links🔻) | Fediverse](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0246d146-a1b3-4665-b824-d2d73a82ae72.jpeg){kind=link}
To Any Curious User browsing “Lemmy Social” or “Reddit alternative”
You can visit https://join-lemmy.org/ to join one of the many server
You can click [Join a server] and chose any istances based on Topic and Language
Or click [see all the servers] to browse all the servers
https://join-lemmy.org/instances
You can also join any of the many social platforms connected to the Fediverse
https://joinfediverse.wiki/Main_Page
i agree on bluesky. its just another walled garden with a few extra features.
as for loops… id say its too early in its development, then, to be included in infographics depicting federating platforms. its lying to new users about what its capable now. if/when he ever gets federation implemented, then we can update literature.
im very confused why everyone wants to market a product that cant yet do the core thing we are all here for. there is zero reason to include it right now.
I didn’t make the criteria to define what a “Fediverse project” can or cannot include, just commenting that it seems to be based on people’s hopes and dreams. e.g. Sublinks, though that one had little to no activity for so long that people really did lose hope for awhile, while Loops is at least actively continuing its development - even though as you say not specifically in terms of federating.
Worst of all is how if the code were released, people would outright do that task for the chief developer, so holding back the codebase (to decide on a specific license or whatever other reason) is the primary limitation. Though - just like Sublinks - if there were any other project that even came close to promising to fulfill that same functionality (as Lemmy does for the forum-based Threadiverse) then people would forget all about Loops. Instead, right now it’s the only one of its kind.