• @over_clox
    link
    137 days ago

    Nobody owns anything anymore. The oligarchs, CEOs and politicians own everything, while only giving the everyday citizens a false idea of ownership via taxes and subscriptions.

    • davel [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      107 days ago

      If “ownership” has any practical meaning at all, I’m pretty sure I own my toothbrush.

      In what ways do taxes give us a sense of ownership? Ownership of what?

      • @j4k3
        link
        English
        77 days ago

        In many places, like here in Orange County California, the local stores stopped carrying “firm” bristle toothbrushes. They only carry more expensive and flashy “soft” bristle varieties in all kinds of nonsense designs and only single and double packs. If you live anywhere poorer, you will notice that ALL of the products sold are different between these areas. If you are very self aware, you may notice that these much more expensive flashy products work terribly and the bristles splay after a week or two in comparison to the versions available in poorer areas where the same amount if money buys an 8-12 multi pack, and each brush will last a couple of months before splaying.

        Information such as this is limited. This is about autonomy. It is also about the ancient issue of false weighted scales in a forum market just in a modern context. Property is not owned when you still pay for extra junk to keep hold of it. That is renting from the real owners just by another name.

        You think you own your toothbrush. Do you, when someone is able to manipulate your perception of choice and dial it how often you repurchase it. Similarly, you do not own property that you do not control. Like your phone is controlled and therefore owned by whomever controls the orphaned kernel and binary modules that make it impossible for anyone to maintain without the SOC and modem hardware documentation. Everything is like this in the present dystopian world. Someone is manipulating and skimming every product and purchase without adding or providing value. This is possible because they are cashing out on citizenship and autonomy often in subtle enough ways to go unnoticed.

        • @YarHarSuperstar
          link
          English
          27 days ago

          This is so well put and relevant. Thank you for you write up, I really appreciate the perspective.

      • @over_clox
        link
        3
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Look back at the OG meme. It suggests the people have 100% ownership of the land, dispersed unevenly though.

        When clearly we do not. Most everyone does not own the dirt they live and dwell on. If you owned it, you wouldn’t have to keep paying for it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          47 days ago

          The meme has nothing to do with land ownership, it’s giving a visual example of wealth differential by diving a map of the US into sections.

          • @over_clox
            link
            -37 days ago

            The meme literally says own in every section.

            How else is anyone supposed to interpret the words presented to them?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              57 days ago

              Perhaps you missed this: the meme says “if U.S. land mass were divided like U.S. wealth.” It’s a simile; it doesn’t mean that this really is the actual ratio that U.S. land is divided.

              • @over_clox
                link
                -37 days ago

                I missed absolutely nothing. I read the exact words on the meme, which imply 100% of people own land.

                Get real, 1% own property, while the other 99% have to rent it from the rich oligarchs and other rich fucks.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 days ago

                  I agree with you that if the meme were to accurately show the amount of land the 1% owns, then the meme would probably show that almost all of the land is owned by the 1%. (I don’t know the actual percentage.) But it says if it were divided like U.S. wealth, so it ironically shows the 1% owning only about 40%. It’s accurate to the amount of wealth that they own, not land.

                  Think of it like a pie chart showing wealth, but instead of a circle it’s (rather misleadingly) shaped like the continental U.S.

                  • @over_clox
                    link
                    14 days ago

                    It’s all misleading. None of it is proportional, whether presented as a pie chart or a map.

                    The diagram, however you want to observe it, literally says 100% of the land is owned, by different regions and classes. Which is obviously a bold faced lie, only a small percentage of people oligarchs actually own the land, they just rent it out to the rest of the people.

                    And if you’re lucky enough to ‘own’ your land, you don’t really own it, you still gotta pay taxes on your dirt…

                • @YarHarSuperstar
                  link
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  What? It does not imply that at all? Let me guess, you also think that the 1% own the entire northwestern corner of the country? And 40% of people live in a single city in Texas?

                  Edit: I’m sorry, this was unnecessarily rude and unnecessary in general.

      • @over_clox
        link
        17 days ago

        Also, remember that many modern devices are unnecessarily connected to the internet. Why WiFi on the refrigerator? Why on the toaster? Why on the microwave?

        Do you even own your toothbrush anymore? It won’t be long and they’ll have you paying a subscription for your toothbrush to scan your DNA at this rate…