• @Buffalox
    link
    26 hours ago

    OK so how are the rules upheld?
    A democracy is a rule by the people who are ruled. What function would make anarchy better?
    Who is this ruler that isn’t present? How are rules decided? Who enforces those rules?
    The only way I see to perform these functions rationally is by democracy.

    • 🕸️ Pip 🕷️
      link
      fedilink
      66 hours ago

      Democracy (proper democracy) is literally a social contract my dude. Anarchism uses democracy and consensus to make decisions. Are laws the only thing keeping you from not doing things??

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 hours ago

        Anarchism uses democracy and consensus to make decisions

        Genuine question: Is that not a democracy?

        • 🕸️ Pip 🕷️
          link
          fedilink
          23 hours ago

          It could be? Being a democracy or using democracy as a tool for decision making doesn’t mean it has to happen through government. If you’ve ever made a decision with a friend group via popular vote, does that make you a government? Or did you exercise authority over your friends when they all agreed popular vote was okay to decide where to eat out? I wager neither

          And fyi, you’re thinking of a representative democracy, which is rarely ever truly fair, especially considering the scale it’s supposedly applied to.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          35 hours ago

          No, as there are no leaders

          In a democracy you give your vote and have no say afterwards.
          In an anarchy people need to work out their social rules together.
          There could also be Anarchist societies with a police force, that ensures the basic democratically created roles of that society are followed - like protecting people from just more muscle who want to rape or steal from them.