@CharlesDarwin to NewsEnglish • 1 month agoDeepSeek might not be as disruptive as claimed, firm reportedly has 50,000 Nvidia GPUs and spent $1.6 billion on buildoutswww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square12arrow-up145arrow-down116cross-posted to: [email protected]newshardware
arrow-up129arrow-down1external-linkDeepSeek might not be as disruptive as claimed, firm reportedly has 50,000 Nvidia GPUs and spent $1.6 billion on buildoutswww.tomshardware.com@CharlesDarwin to NewsEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square12cross-posted to: [email protected]newshardware
minus-square@CharlesDarwinOPlinkEnglish17•1 month agoHuh, well imagine that. The truth is more complicated than the initial hype.
minus-square@fallowseedlink8•1 month agodoesn’t that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P
minus-square@CharlesDarwinOPlinkEnglish7•1 month agoI guess. Although Meta does the same, and I’m not sure of the motivations.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•1 month agoUnless their goal was shorting the affected tech stocks. They were a financial firm originally right?
Huh, well imagine that. The truth is more complicated than the initial hype.
doesn’t that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P
I guess. Although Meta does the same, and I’m not sure of the motivations.
Unless their goal was shorting the affected tech stocks. They were a financial firm originally right?