• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    35
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What I think you all need:

    1. A manifesto with surgically specific changes you want done that will be guaranteed to permanently fix things (so healthcare reform along with a pre-prepared legal framework etc.). With as broad concensus as possible (so eg. with unions on board probably)
    2. A general strike to force whichever party is currently in power to implement that manifesto.

    Pros:

    • Still constitutinal. On paper it’s the politicians that opted for this and nobody forced their hand.
    • A surgically specific manifesto will make it blatantly obvious whether your demands have been met or not – and hence whether the strike may cease. No space for watering down. This is why being specific is crucial.
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 month ago

      Is there historical precedent for unions hoarding money so that they can supplant workers’ pay while they’re striking?

    • @finitebanjo
      link
      -11 month ago

      Something a lot of Tankies don’t understand, and I’m not accusing you in particular but a lot of general strike advocates certainly are, is that the US Government doesn’t operate the US Industry. You’re not going to do jack shit with a general strike, the Republicans are already beating the economy with a stick on their own, you don’t need to pitch in.

      • @thespcicifcocean
        link
        21 month ago

        remember when the world shut down for a few days because covid? The whole system nearly collapsed because apparently everyone is an essential worker. a well organized general strike will bring them to their knees.

        • @glitchdx
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          we can’t even get everyone to vote, a strike of that magnitude is a pipe dream.