• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      107 hours ago

      That’s probably part of the plan. They want the post office gone to make room for private companies. Fuck all the people that live in remote areas where it isn’t profitable to have mail I guess.

    • @teamevil
      link
      5711 hours ago

      Which the stupid Republicans will use to continue to try to privatize something that should never have been privatized and should never be privatized The Republicans are the Nazis now and they need to be stopped

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -1210 hours ago

      Chinese packages are a net negative for the post office, you can probably find articles about that from Trump’s first term.

      • @Cornelius_Wangenheim
        link
        6
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I don’t know why you got down voted because it’s 100% true. NPR did a fairly good episode on it: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2018/08/01/634737852/episode-857-the-postal-illuminati

        Edit: To summarize, there’s an international org (UPU) that controls the amount postal services can charge each other to deliver mail/parcels. The current due is below what it costs to actually deliver a parcel, so a package from China actually costs the USPS money. That cost gets passed on as higher domestic fees, leading to a situation where a shipper is charged ~5x more to ship something domestically compared to what a company in China is charged to ship to the US.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          26 hours ago

          People don’t like when something Trump does could have good reasons. It does seem accidental in this case, but it doesn’t make it not true.

          • @ByteJunk
            link
            14 hours ago

            How about you wake up and stop painting shit in gold?

            Trump doing some good (which I don’t even think is the case here) is purely incidental to serving his own self interests.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 hours ago

        The USPS was never intended to turn a profit. It’s not a business. Its entire purpose is to deliver mail to every American, regardless of where they’re located. Making that profitable was never realistic nor necessary for a government service.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 hours ago

          It doesn’t have to profit, but it also doesn’t have to subsidize incoming packages from China.

            • bjorney
              link
              fedilink
              77 hours ago

              The UN Postal Union sets guidelines for international mail that dictates developing countries shouldn’t have to pay full price to send mail to developed countries. Basically if it costs $30 to ship something from a developing country, they would charge $20 and the destination country would pay for the shortfall (dollar values not real). China was a much smaller economy when this agreement was drafted.

              The US renegotiated this agreement with the United postal union in 2019/2020 but there were still come compromises made - while the amount of subsidization is minimal compared to 10 years ago, USPS still allegedly eats some losses on every package from China.

              Basically Trump is mad because the deal he personally negotiated 5 years ago wasn’t good enough. Same thing that happened with his trade agreement with Canada

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 hours ago

        Everything they do is a “net negative”! My company’s IT and HR departments don’t generate any revenue at all…