• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2914 hours ago

    Yes, so not only are they doing something shady, they’re doing something shady and exposing your data to anyone wanting to snoop it. What’s dumb about criticising the latter part?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2213 hours ago

      The fact that anyone thinks they have any semblance of privacy when typing into an online AI chatbot is saddening.

      Of course anything you type into a externally hosted AI is going to be harvested and sold.

      But sure, in this case you are also potentially exposing your queries to your ISP or someone listening on your local network too.

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1613 hours ago

        Privacy is not the same as security

      • @breadsmasher
        link
        English
        19
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Regardless of the downstream server, you should expect the interim traffic to be encrypted in transit

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -113 hours ago

          Sure, it’s not a bad thing and it should be standard practice, but to act like encrypted traffic guarantees privacy is silly.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            The thing is that with the traffic unencrypted it opens the door to all sorts of attacks on that traffic.

            It’s not just privacy.

            If you can intercept and interpret you have the ability to replace as well.

            This is the integrity of your data

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            613 hours ago

            Tell me where in this thread are anyone expecting privacy from any online LLM service, or anyone saying encrypted traffic guarantees privacy?