For one, reducing the turbulence area and increasing the air intake at that angle is going to create a vortex effect near the intake. This could lead to dangerous cavitation and knocking effects. It’s likely will require splitting the power train into two chambers, with an internal membrane. My suggestion is somewhere near the Mason carpetbagger and the Dixon scalawag.
For two, I think that was genius what you’ve done with the reduction of the diffuser, minimizing drag, but where, my friend, do you plan to dispose of all the waste products? We don’t want those infecting the rest of the machine, and I think it’s disingenuous to think we can just empty those right out into the environment without some kind of regulatory backlash.
I have some engineering concerns.
For one, reducing the turbulence area and increasing the air intake at that angle is going to create a vortex effect near the intake. This could lead to dangerous cavitation and knocking effects. It’s likely will require splitting the power train into two chambers, with an internal membrane. My suggestion is somewhere near the Mason carpetbagger and the Dixon scalawag.
For two, I think that was genius what you’ve done with the reduction of the diffuser, minimizing drag, but where, my friend, do you plan to dispose of all the waste products? We don’t want those infecting the rest of the machine, and I think it’s disingenuous to think we can just empty those right out into the environment without some kind of regulatory backlash.