Summary

NATO allies informally discussed deploying troops to Greenland after Trump threatened military action to seize the Danish territory.

Germany and other European nations explored possible responses, including invoking NATO’s Article 5, though it was ruled out due to US veto power.

Denmark pledged $1.5 billion to bolster Arctic security, while NATO considered expanding its presence.

Trump cites strategic concerns over Russian and Chinese influence and US missile defense. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte acknowledged Arctic security needs but sought to defuse tensions.

  • @lemmylommy
    link
    English
    297 hours ago

    The new alliance already exists. It’s called the European Union.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      106 hours ago

      The EU doesn’t include the UK, Canada, Norway, or Turkey. It isn’t really a good NATO substitute.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, we really need some kind of external European defence sphere to cover us in Canada. No amount of maple syrup (or rare earth metals) is too great a cost.

        • TrenchcoatFullOfBats
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 hours ago

          Two of those are Commonwealth countries. Maybe a common defense mechanism could be agreed. Instead of Iron Dome, it could be called King Dome.

          • @P00ptart
            link
            English
            24 hours ago

            You could make all kinds of jokes about king dome come.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 hours ago

            I guess, but the UK is a pretty shit-tier nuclear power. I’d really want it to include France.