Summary

NATO allies informally discussed deploying troops to Greenland after Trump threatened military action to seize the Danish territory.

Germany and other European nations explored possible responses, including invoking NATO’s Article 5, though it was ruled out due to US veto power.

Denmark pledged $1.5 billion to bolster Arctic security, while NATO considered expanding its presence.

Trump cites strategic concerns over Russian and Chinese influence and US missile defense. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte acknowledged Arctic security needs but sought to defuse tensions.

  • Chainweasel
    link
    English
    505 days ago

    Germany and other European nations explored possible responses, including invoking NATO’s Article 5, though it was ruled out due to US veto power.

    And this is the only reason why Trump didn’t pull the US out of NATO.
    Because of the veto power, he can effectively block them from taking action against the United States.
    NATO is dead.
    If other world leaders had half a brain between them, they would be forming a new alliance without the United States as we speak.

    • @lemmylommy
      link
      English
      405 days ago

      The new alliance already exists. It’s called the European Union.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        155 days ago

        The EU doesn’t include the UK, Canada, Norway, or Turkey. It isn’t really a good NATO substitute.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Yeah, we really need some kind of external European defence sphere to cover us in Canada. No amount of maple syrup (or rare earth metals) is too great a cost.

          • TrenchcoatFullOfBats
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 days ago

            Two of those are Commonwealth countries. Maybe a common defense mechanism could be agreed. Instead of Iron Dome, it could be called King Dome.

            • @P00ptart
              link
              English
              45 days ago

              You could make all kinds of jokes about king dome come.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 days ago

              I guess, but the UK is a pretty shit-tier nuclear power. I’d really want it to include France.

      • Chainweasel
        link
        English
        195 days ago

        They literally can’t, the US is a permanent member.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          175 days ago

          We’re seeing from the White House that written words, rules, and laws are meaningless to them. They’re only a permanent member because words say so, and the members are willing to honour those words. If the USA were to attack another NATO member I’m sure those words can and will be ignored.

        • Pennomi
          link
          English
          115 days ago

          They could reorganize as “NOT-U” under all the same terms but without the US.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        NATO has no provision to remove members. It’s even worse than the EU where a single other member is enough to veto it.

        Stop doing that, Western leaders. 3/4 vote should be enough for anything.

    • @Maggoty
      link
      English
      75 days ago

      There’s nothing stopping them from just ignoring the veto of the country they’re worried about…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 days ago

      Yes, a new military alliance and other new non-US Western treaties needs to happen. Badly.

      Although, he’s saying he wants 5% spending from all members now, so maybe he’s still planning to “shoot himself in the foot” by leaving.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      45 days ago

      “We’ll make our own NATO, with blackjack and hookers!”

  • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
    link
    English
    325 days ago

    Didn’t have “NATO deployed against America” on my bingo card. Plenty of other batshittery, but not that one.

    • FiveMacs
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 days ago

      I was curious what the plan was when nayo allies attack each other…apparently it’s fuck Nazis and trump regardless of the country’s status with nato

  • @Blade9732
    link
    English
    145 days ago

    Hey NATO, you don’t have to send any troops. Just tell the Pentagon that you sent the Swedes and the Finns. When they say “Where? We don’t see anyone” Just respond"Exactly"

  • Sunshine (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    175 days ago

    Please send troops to Canada! We can build the barracks to house them by the thousands to stop America from potentially annexing Canada. I wouldn’t put anything past that orange buffoon.

      • @not_that_guy05
        link
        English
        15 days ago

        Foreign legion of Canada?

        That will do so much damage just like it’s going in Ukraine.

          • @not_that_guy05
            link
            English
            15 days ago

            Why would you want a voluntary group willing to fight for Canada to die?

            Do you understand what the foreign legion of Ukraine does?

  • @TehWorld
    link
    English
    35 days ago

    Russia has the option to do the funniest thing ever.

  • shoulderoforion
    link
    fedilink
    -115 days ago

    “discussed” hahahahahahahahaha gtfo, whilst it’s eventually not outside the realm of possibility, it’s going to take millions dead before Europe squares up with Trump’s America. discussed, yes, they discussed it, looked at each other then laughed and took a two week vacation.