@[email protected] to Mildly InfuriatingEnglish • 1 month agoDevelopers: "Yes, the users love cluttered homes, just put everything there and ignore guidelines"discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1475arrow-down115file-text
arrow-up1460arrow-down1imageDevelopers: "Yes, the users love cluttered homes, just put everything there and ignore guidelines"discuss.tchncs.de@[email protected] to Mildly InfuriatingEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square95fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@whalerosslinkEnglish4•1 month agoDeveloping it would be way above my skills but I’ve been fantasising about it for a long time. https://lemmy.world/comment/14344097
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoSame. I think it would be more friendly for end-users too.
minus-square@whalerosslinkEnglish1•30 days agoIn my mind you could use it as your regular hierarchical file system, but the hierarchies are dynamic to your associations or needs.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-230 days agoWell, tree-based as we know it, is messy. Can’t have a file that belongs to two places. Next time you look for it, you climb the tree, only to not find it in the other place the file belongs to.
Developing it would be way above my skills but I’ve been fantasising about it for a long time. https://lemmy.world/comment/14344097
Same. I think it would be more friendly for end-users too.
Just sounds messy and impractical
In my mind you could use it as your regular hierarchical file system, but the hierarchies are dynamic to your associations or needs.
Well, tree-based as we know it, is messy. Can’t have a file that belongs to two places. Next time you look for it, you climb the tree, only to not find it in the other place the file belongs to.