Summary

Democrats Stansbury and Raskin introduced the “Nobody Elected Elon Musk Act,” which targets Elon Musk’s dismantling of federal services through the DOGE cost-cutting scheme.

It seeks personal liability for Musk, amid lawsuits and concerns over sensitive data access.

The proposal aims to protect taxpayers and critical federal operations against unauthorized actions.

  • @YamahaRevstar
    link
    18
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    NEEMA? It sounds fine. Dems are trying to do something and you bitch about the name.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s not like I’m making a big stink about it. I just think it’s a dumb name and it gives more spotlight to musk which he craves. It also puts the focus on him. We’ve already heard the conservative refrain: “we didn’t elect fauci!” Yes it’s a false equivalency. Yes it’s in bad faith. But the musk-focused name is meant to be a PR signal and it’s a bad one. Call it something about how we don’t elect people like him period. Make it about how “the voters choose who runs things.”

      The name is deliberate. It’s a part of the strategy. I am allowed to critique strategy, and I think my point here is valid. That is in no way counter to supporting their acting on this.