This post is inspired by me seeing an ambulance in the bike lane by the apartment building opposite of mine.
By this point, I’m sure we’ve all had just about enough of anti-urbanists and NIMBYs claiming in bad faith that bike lanes and bus lanes will be obstructive for emergency vehicles, and as such cannot be built.
You’re probably well aware that exactly the opposite is the case - cars are the principal obstruction for emergency vehicles, and emergency vehicles can actually make very efficient use of bike and bus lanes to shorten response times.
I propose that we flip the argument on its head by rebranding bike and bus lanes as Emergency Vehicle-lanes, which just so happen to afford permission to buses and bikes when not in active use by emergency vehicles (which is of course already the case, everyone is required to yield any space to emergency vehicles, at least where I live).
This way, we kill this particular argument against bike and bus lanes in its crib, and expose the opposition as being actually against emergency vehicle mobility, in favour of having more lanes to drive their cars on.
Let me know what you think!
Bikes could pretty easily get out of the way, buses less so. If we’re talking about physical-barrier lanes. Painted-stripe lanes, sure.
As someone who drives a wheelchair-modified minivan, I have to note that the design of the physical-barrier bike lanes I’ve encountered has turned streets that were “park anywhere legal, don’t feed the meter” to “there’s only one blue space, it’s at the far end of the street, and someone else is already in it, the other six spaces don’t allow you to drop your ramp.” Oh, and the sidewalk is now narrowed, with signposts making passage difficult. So I think the whole design process needs to be rethought. But that’s a whole nother thing.