I know I have small hands but c’mon. Flagship phones these days are strait up small tablets, not even what we’d have called on phablets 15 years ago.

I know it’s what people buy, but I’m still sad that if I want a phone that small then I have to deal with camera and display a couple gens old

  • @RedditWanderer
    link
    0
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    fuckup this well established term

    dude just Google “flagship meaning”

    the best or most important thing owned or produced by a particular organization.

    Theres a company called The minimal company, their best and most important product is a small “minimal phone”. That’s their flagship phone. It’s not hard to understand

    • @SchmidtGenetics
      link
      1
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      As I explained previously, you’re cherry picking definitions to support your point.

      Multiple other definitions that I provided you contradict that, and just repeating and saying the same thing doesn’t suddenly make it true. Even with minimalist phone, it doesn’t have all the bells and whistles, which is another important criteria and you’re choosing to ignore to make your asinine point.

      A flagship has never been a cigar boat and that’s exactly what OP has clarified they wanted. So I was correct all along.

      • @RedditWanderer
        link
        -1
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Everyone agrees youre just making stuff up at this point.

        • @SchmidtGenetics
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          ??? Plenty of people are pointing the same thing out

          It’s just you swinging this dude, and I’ve provided proof that you’re wrong, you’ve cherry picked a single definition and I provided multiple separate sources. As well had to explain how the minimalists phone still wouldn’t by definition ever be the “flagship” of its small and has no features.

          As you said, just fucking google it. You didn’t just look at one source now did you…? When researching you must look at more than a single source. Thats just being obtuse lmfao. If you “googled” it and did any actual investigating you should have seen that the deification you picked isn’t the standard one.

          And again, op has clarified their stance. The minimalist phone isn’t what they want/need so you using it as an example is just asinine and shows you missed the point completely lmfao. Give your head a shake bud.