I don’t mean morally wrong, I know that sexuality is a spectrum, that everyone is different, and I shouldn’t let anyone tell me how to describe myself, I mean wrong terminology.

Like how a man who’s attracted to other men wouldn’t call himself straight for example.

I’m certainly not straight, even if there’s one woman I’ve ever liked and the rest were men, I still liked a girl.

I would definitely date regardless of gender but only one women has really been attractive to me. Although I’d date and love regardless, other genders don’t really give me the spark men do.

If I dated a man who transitioned to nonbinary or transfem, I would still love them regardless and wouldn’t lose my interest in him.

I consider myself attracted to women maybe ~5% of the time, 95% other genders (most of the 95% is male but IDK the exact percentage on that part)

Would omni/bi be a better description?

    • hendrik
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      By the way, “queer” is the umbrella term. It is correct, since it means someone isn’t heterosexual. Or cisgender. So gender identity is mixed in as well, next to sexual orientation. But it doesn’t really say anything specific. Could be a gay person, or a straight person, or a bisexual person or someone who is asexual. So for example if someone wants to know what kind of people somebody else is into, it’s kind of a useless description. Could be anything. Or nothing.
      (And this is an oversimplification.)