Summary

Donald Trump stated that Palestinians displaced by Israel’s military actions would not have a right to return to Gaza under his plan.

Instead, he proposed resettling them in Egypt and Jordan, despite both nations rejecting the idea.

Trump suggested creating permanent refugee communities funded by the U.S., calling Gaza a “real estate development for the future.”

His proposal has drawn condemnation from Arab nations and legal experts, with the UN warning it could constitute ethnic cleansing and violate international law.

Israel’s far-right settlers welcomed the plan.

  • Admiral Patrick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    “But if the Dems ran a better candidate…”

    “But Harris didn’t even stop in Dearborn, so it’s her fault not ours”

    “Sure, everything Trump says is a lie, but at least he stopped here to lie to our faces. It’s the dem’s fault.”

    “One of Trump’s first acts last time was a Muslim ban, but I can’t be arsed to remember that far back”

    “I had to vote for this otherwise the dems wouldn’t learn anything”

    /s

    • @cm0002
      link
      English
      2924 hours ago

      “we just had to teach the DNC a lesson at the polls during that specific election!!!”

      • @distantsounds
        link
        English
        -24
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Biden: I just have to aid genocide during an election year when I’m up against an absolute fascist.

        Edit: cope and deal with it

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1623 hours ago

              “Ooh I have a choice between genocide or genocide with extra fucking awful fascist bullshit. Which shall I choose? I know, I’ll go for the obviously worse option because I’m a good person” <— you

              • @distantsounds
                link
                English
                023 hours ago

                I voted dem, my state is blue, and we have a great local community. It’s been awful in Gaza long before trump. You can stand by whatever level of government funded genocide you want. There is nuance to voting, but not when I comes to aiding war crimes when you have complete power to stop sending munitions

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  122 hours ago

                  OK, but you do realize that there was no option in this election that would achieve the results they wanted, right?

                  There was a choice for the status quo, and one to make things exponentially worse. People chose the exponentially worse option and are idiots for it.

                  • @distantsounds
                    link
                    English
                    022 hours ago

                    Yeah, I know all that and voted with that in mind. I live in a non swing state. I’m not still defending genocide in comment sections 3 months after the election. You do realize it would have been cheaper for Biden to not send munitions and win over voters had he not continued on as he did. Untapped voting bloc, the nongenocide vote.

        • @atomicorange
          link
          English
          723 hours ago

          Do you think the message got across to him? Did the DNC learn anything?

          • @distantsounds
            link
            English
            4
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            No, he’s a demented old man who broke many promises…like only running 1 term. That doesn’t mean you don’t say anything. It’s almost as if they are representing the will of the people…you need to show up and say something…like using your 1st amendment rights to organize and protest

            Edit: fuck trump, his supporters & and anyone who can’t understand Biden’s role in giving the presidency back to trump. You can also add anyone in swing states that voted 3rd party/abstained

            • @atomicorange
              link
              English
              422 hours ago

              I’d like to earnestly suggest you reevaluate your strategy. Clearly threatening/withholding general election votes hasn’t been successful, and there’s obviously a lot of risk of negative outcomes like Trump winning. I think the general election is just too late in the process for a protest vote to mean anything.

              I’m all for showing up and saying something, and I think pressure and threats during primary voting have worked in the past. I think we could have applied a LOT more pressure earlier in the process and might have had a better outcome. Now instead we have the worst possible result for the people of Palestine.

              • @Keeponstalin
                link
                English
                622 hours ago

                They did apply a lot of pressure during the primary. The total uncommitted in the Primary was 706,591 (Which may have been undercounted) which is absolutely massive for a primary. On average, general turnout is twice that of primary turnout. The Democratic Party knew that at they were risking at least 1.4 million votes by ignoring the issue. Here Are 34 Polls That Show A Ceasefire & Weapons Embargo Help Kamala Win. They also knew throughout the whole campaign that a vast majority of their constituents wanted weapons embargo and permanent ceasefire (required by domestic and international law), plus a majority of independents and Republicans. There was no valid reason for the Democratic Party to ignore the demands of that many voters, especially if trying to win an election

              • @distantsounds
                link
                English
                122 hours ago

                I wouldn’t hold my strategy at more fault that the DNC and it’s strategists. They’re the ones with a billion dollars at their disposal and it’s kind of their job to appeal to voters. People have needs and cutting off billions in “genocide-aid” seems like a no brainer. Countless opportunities to invoke the Leahy Act, win over more voters, and save some money.

                …but I’m only a constituent, what do I know

                • @atomicorange
                  link
                  English
                  122 hours ago

                  You can’t control their strategy, but you can control yours.

                  I think we’ve seen enough of the DNC now to know what to expect. I don’t think we can count on their promises or their logic. I’m not trying to blame you for Trump’s win, just suggesting that we work together (if we get another chance) to apply pressure at points when it will HELP. I don’t think protest voting during the last general election was the right move. Let’s learn from it instead of insisting it was the right thing to do.

          • @distantsounds
            link
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            Correct.

            Kamala: I would do nothing different

            • @Mrkawfee
              link
              English
              521 hours ago

              She wouldn’t let a Palestinian speak at the DNC and pledged to do everything in her power to suck up to Netanyahu. There is so much cope here. There is no fucking difference between Biden, Kamala and Trump. They all suck off Satanyahu. The US is controlled by the Israel lobby. Mearsheimer has been screaming about this for 20 years.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -2
                edit-2
                20 hours ago

                Right, because Harris wanted to kick all of the Palestinians out so she could build a resort.

                At least she and Biden attempted to negotiate peace.

                • @S491
                  link
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  17 hours ago

                  Yes Biden, and by extension Kamala “nothing different” Harris, did want to kick out the Palestinians, they just tried to do it under the table https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-egypt-trump-displacement-bc1c43f80655190824a5de4eb1d310cc

                  “The diplomat said Egypt rejected similar proposals from the Biden administration and European countries early in the war, which was sparked by Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 attack into southern Israel. The earlier proposals were broached privately, while Trump announced his plan at a White House press conference alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.”

                • @Keeponstalin
                  link
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  18 hours ago

                  At least she and Biden attempted to negotiate peace.

                  No, they really didn’t. That was the whole problem

                  The rhetoric coming out of the White House, when it has been focused on peace or restraint, rather than continuous war, has been undercut at every turn by its actions. The constant supply of weapons — $17.9 billion of bullets, bombs, shells, and other military aid in the past year — has allowed Israel to keep waging its war on Gaza, and in recent weeks, expand that war to Lebanon and threaten to escalate its conflict with Iran. Despite documentation of U.S. weapons being used in probable war crimes, and credible allegations that Israel is committing genocide in its war on Gaza, the bombs have continued to flow.

                  Year of Empty Rhetoric From the White House on Israel’s Wars

                  The diplomat said Egypt rejected similar proposals from the Biden administration and European countries early in the war, which was sparked by Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 attack into southern Israel. The earlier proposals were broached privately, while Trump announced his plan at a White House press conference alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

                  https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-egypt-trump-displacement-bc1c43f80655190824a5de4eb1d310cc

          • @distantsounds
            link
            English
            -723 hours ago

            You don’t make friends with genocide 🤷‍♂️

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1523 hours ago

      But if the Dems ran a better candidate…

      This is completely valid criticism. Stop pretending it’s not. The DNC is in the habit of specifically going out of their way to choose unpopular pundits, and that’s not voters fault.

      Voting for Trump, or not voting is their fault…

      • Admiral Patrick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        623 hours ago

        You clearly have no idea how US elections work at that level. The single candidate with the most votes wins. “Not Trump” was not a candidate.

        If Trump gets 49% of the vote, Harris 48%, and “other” gets 3%, that’s not counted as 51% against Trump and he loses. That’s Trump winning with 49% of the vote.

        Anyone who didn’t vote (or didn’t vote for the only candidate likely to defeat Trump) is responsible for his win.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1423 hours ago

          Anyone who didn’t vote (or didn’t vote for the only candidate likely to defeat Trump) is responsible for his win.

          Two things can be true at once. Voters not voting is bad, and it’s their fault. The DNC being incapable of finding pundits people want to vote for is also bad, and is also their fault. Pointing one out, has nothing to do with the other and both of these factors led to the election of Donald Trump not once, but TWICE.

          Pointing out the DNC’s responsibility to find electable candidates doesn’t elevate the voters responsibility. But if the DNC were capable of finding pundits voters wanted to vote for no issue would exist. You wouldn’t have people refusing to vote, or voting for Trump out of some fucked up sense of “haha, I’m gonna stick it to you!”

          Pretending like this issue is solely at the fault of the voters is so fucking disingenuous, disgusting and partyist its insane.

          • Admiral Patrick
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            The DNC could have run an iguana wearing an offensive trucker hat, and we still should have voted for the iguana when Trump was the alternative or stood a chance of winning again.

            It’s up to the voters to make smart choices, and some of them made the stupid choice.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              The DNC could have run an iguana wearing an offensive trucker hat, and we still should have voted for the iguana when Trump was the alternative or stood a chance of winning again.

              You don’t have to convince me of this. I completely agree. I’ve said only that the DNC has a responsibility to provide something better than an Iguana and for the past three election cycles, that’s what we’ve got and people are pissed. But every time you try to have meaningful discourse about how the DNC is only supplying Iguana people treat you like you’re some kind of turncoat who voted for Trump. And that’s just bullshit.

              We need to be mad at non-voters, people who “lashed out” and voted for Trump, and people who let themselves be swept away by the lies of a grifter who we did nothing but warn them about. But we also need to be mad at the DNC… It’s not entirely the voters fault and fuck anyone who says it is.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                317 hours ago

                We need to be mad at non-voters, people who “lashed out” and voted for Trump, and people who let themselves be swept away by the lies of a grifter who we did nothing but warn them about. But we also need to be mad at the DNC

                Please also try to funnel that anger into meaningful action. Staying mad at non-voters is understandable but also entirely unhelpful. Staying mad at the DNC however is both understandable and rational, and has the potential to drive change if you allow yourself to channel it into something productive.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  153 minutes ago

                  Staying mad at the DNC however is both understandable and rational, and has the potential to drive change if you allow yourself to channel it into something productive.

                  So much fucking this. The DNC has to learn from past mistakes or this shit is going to keep happening, and unless people are mad at them, they won’t even think to change.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          620 hours ago

          YOU do not seem to know how elections work beyond a single cycle. You view each election as singular isolated event, and you have zero perspective of the grander game that’s played between cycles.

          What exactly do you think would happen if 100% of Dem voters always “voted blue no matter who?” If every Dem vote is already locked in from day one, what incentive does the party have to do anything to actually represent them? This is why the Dems worked so hard to court Republicans to vote for Harris. They figured that the Dem base was so scared of Trump that their votes were already locked in.

          If you want a party to actually represent your beliefs, there have to be some people on your side willing to walk away if the party drifts too far out of line. If no Democratic voters are ever willing to abandon a Democrat for being too conservative, then the Dem candidates will drift further and further right each cycle.

          Yes, there’s the idea of democracy being on the line, but when is democracy NOT going to be on the line? And truthfully, the Democratic leaders proved that they were not reliable stewards of Democracy. The party that nominated Garland had zero ability to argue that they would defend democracy. Just look at how limp-wristed the Democrats in Congress have been in responding to Trump’s lawlessness. These people are not capable of defending democracy. Trump should have been thrown in Gitmo on day one of the Biden administration. Instead Biden nominated a Republican to be his attorney general, and the rest is history.

        • @Keeponstalin
          link
          English
          522 hours ago

          You clearly have no idea how US elections work at that level. The single candidate with the most votes wins.

          Which is exactly why in order to win an election, a campaign needs to offer concessions to voters to earn as many votes as possible.

          Something the Democratic Party’s Campaign decisively chose not to do, and in fact do the opposite.

          Instead of trying to secure hundreds of thousands to millions of constituents by supporting a permanent ceasefire and weapons embargo, a policy vastly supported by the Democrats own voter base (in addition to the majority of also independent and Republican voters), they instead alienated those voters by more than just ignoring their valid concerns.

          They chose to arrest thousands of student protestors, gave billions of dollars to a genocide at the tax payers expense consistently for 15 months, actively suppressed the voices and representation of the main victims of the genocide, and campaigned with Liz Cheney (who was actively involved with the Bush-Cheney foreign policy in the middle east and enthusiastically pro ethnic cleansing of Palestinians). They chose to do all that instead of represent the view of the majority of their constituents and abide by domestic/international law.

          And that was just one of the major issues, along with immigration and the economy, that tanked the approval of the Democratic Party. If the Democratic Party wanted to actually win against Trump they would have done everything to gain as many votes as possible. They chose not to. They threw the election and let an unpopular fascist win.

        • @brendansimms
          link
          English
          223 hours ago

          most electoral college votes. Less people voted for trump than did for Hillary in 2016, and he still won.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -181 day ago

      “Democrats will ignore you if they can always count on your vote”

      “Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil”

      • Admiral Patrick
        link
        English
        16
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        And idiotic absolutism is why we’re in this mess.

        Good job!

        Edit: If you meant the /s on your comment, my bad. There’s just so many insane takes going around, I kind of need that to differentiate.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          524 hours ago

          Maybe I’m just getting whooshed here, but aren’t you and atzanteol saying the same thing? lol

          Are they just getting downvoted because the forgot the “/s”?

          • Admiral Patrick
            link
            English
            624 hours ago

            Are we? I feel like that’s a pretty necessary “/s” considering the mental gymnastics I’ve heard IRL and on Lemmy. If they edit their comment to add that very necessary qualifier, I’ll happily throw 'em an upvote. As-is, I genuinely have no idea.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              023 hours ago

              I for sure hear you on the insane takes flying around! From the context it looked pretty clear to me that they were tagging on to your post rather than trying to contradict it, but who knows.

              Posting sarcasm about a controversial topic without a “/s” tag is like fucking without a condom… it carries a risk, but sometimes you just gotta do what feels right!

        • The Quuuuuill
          link
          fedilink
          English
          324 hours ago

          our best bet was in the primaries in 2020. from there it’s all been about our best opportunities to keep trump away from power regardless. i know america sucks. i live here, too. but to act like voting for the lesser of two evils in a binary choice election was worse than letting trump have power is to dissengage from the fact that this is america. this is how the system is stacked against us. you don’t get to just magically not be part of it because you don’t like it. there was nothing stopping you from organizing resistance under kamala. but there’s plenty of violence under trump that’s making it hard to organize.