@Mickey7 to Lemmy Shitpost • 1 month agoLooks legit, but can it actually be a real thing?imagemessage-square81arrow-up1408arrow-down19
arrow-up1399arrow-down1imageLooks legit, but can it actually be a real thing?@Mickey7 to Lemmy Shitpost • 1 month agomessage-square81
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 month agoHere on wikipedia it says they don’t, because the software is automated and only displays a blurred image.
minus-square🇸🇵🇪🇨🇺🇱🇦🇹🇪🇷link6•1 month agoBut the raw data of every single American who had flown does exist. The government has a database of every tattoo, mole, and genital of everyone who has ever used an airplane.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month agoI like to force them to touch me personally. That way I at least get something out of this bullshit.
minus-square97xBamlinkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-21 month agoWhat’s the point of scanning someone at that level of precision if they can’t even see it? Seems pretty pointless to me.
minus-square@Opiseklink2•30 days agoWell its intended function is not to generate nonconsensual nudes, but to detect the presence of weapons.
minus-square97xBamlinkfedilinkEnglish2•30 days agolol, I get that part, but how can they assess the presence of weapons if it’s blurred.
Here on wikipedia it says they don’t, because the software is automated and only displays a blurred image.
But the raw data of every single American who had flown does exist. The government has a database of every tattoo, mole, and genital of everyone who has ever used an airplane.
I like to force them to touch me personally. That way I at least get something out of this bullshit.
What’s the point of scanning someone at that level of precision if they can’t even see it? Seems pretty pointless to me.
Well its intended function is not to generate nonconsensual nudes, but to detect the presence of weapons.
lol, I get that part, but how can they assess the presence of weapons if it’s blurred.