@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 days agoAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzimagemessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1331arrow-down12
arrow-up1329arrow-down1imageAt this rate, why not.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 days agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-square@EheranlinkEnglish4•3 days agoNo, absolutely not. This is increasing the surface area and availability of rocks that take up CO2.
minus-squaremagnetospherelinkfedilink2•3 days agoBy “level”, I’m talking about the practicality and wisdom of the idea.
This is “nuke the hurricane”-level science.
No, absolutely not. This is increasing the surface area and availability of rocks that take up CO2.
By “level”, I’m talking about the practicality and wisdom of the idea.
It is not comparable.