Hundreds of protesters stormed the Swedish embassy in Baghdad in the early hours of Thursday morning and set it on fire, a source familiar with the matter and a Reuters witness said, in a protest against the expected burning of a Koran in Sweden.

  • izzent
    link
    English
    111 year ago

    Removed by mod

    • Chariotwheel
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Or to put it in other ways: you can burn a bible just fine.

      Heck, someone even got a permission to burn a torah and a bible, showed up and then didn’t burn them, but made his point that he could’ve.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not a believer, but I’d say that the holy book of one of the biggest religions on the planet is rather important in the global context. It’s literally one of the major ethical foundation of over two billion people or at least a big part of these believers.

      So like it or no, it matters on the geo political scale. It certainly matters enough to some people to actually storm an embassy over a perceived great insult. Now if that’s a good thing that so many people take it that seriously is another question. I for one don’t like that, but that doesn’t make it go away.

      • @bossitoOP
        link
        English
        141 year ago

        It’s not a friendly act, but should it be banned? Sweden also allows you to burn a bible. Also not a friendly act, but should it be banned? Why sacrifice our freedom to appease religious zealots? We also used to have them in Europe. Our right to burn a bible was not God-given, it took centuries to conquer and is not even legal everywhere.

        Now, again, it’s not a friendly gesture, for sure, I wouldn’t do it, but I like to know that I could do it without being arrested, because why should anyone being arrested for burning a book they bought? People are not arrested for burning gallons of fuel while driving SUVs and that I find easier to argue for.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not a friendly act, but should it be banned?

          I didn’t argue for either way. I’m just pointing out the importance of this specific book and that obviously we should be aware of potential consequences. It certainly sucks that some people take their religion so seriously to injure or kill other people, but it’s really not unexpected nor unprecedented.

          So if Sweden does allow the burning, which does have it’s pros and cons, then they have to consider the ramification they could face. That of course should include taking the security of their embassies in extreme religious countries into consideration. Not sure what they did in that regard, but it certainly wasn’t enough.

          It’s very easy to sit behind anonymity and argue for the importance of allowing such freedom of expression when we aren’t the ones put in danger because of it.

          • @bossitoOP
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            I think Sweden, and Denmark for that matter, are very well aware of the potential violence this unleashes, they’ve been suffering quite a few attacks against their embassies in recent years for jokes, cartoons or quran burnings.

            And yes, it’s easy for me to say this behind anonymity. I live in Brussels and wouldn’t be speaking so easily under my own name. Which says a lot about the degradation of freedom to express your opinions about religion without fearing for your security in Europe today. So yeah, I don’t want to lose that freedom. Better to close the embassies in Iraq.

            Again, I wouldn’t burn a quran. But do I think it’s a sacred book above criticism? No, I absolutely do not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -61 year ago

      The Quran does not have to be important to you personally, but burning it has no good intentions towards Muslim populations inside and outside Sweden.

      Swedish authorities were informed about the planned Quran burning and actively allowed it. Allowing the Quran burning is imo more extreme and political, than not allowing it.

      • izzent
        link
        English
        121 year ago

        That’s pandering to terrorists. Don’t bow your head to those who want to chop it.

          • izzent
            link
            English
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Am I to understand you’re calling those who burned the Qur’an Nazis? You’re too far gone to argue with in this case. Have you even read why they burned it? To incite a response. Which happened just as predicted.

            Not to mention how disingenuous it is to separate the terms terrorist and Nazi. They’re one and the same in the end.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              Burning books associated exclusively with certain ethnic groups is obviously Nazi behaviour.

              It has happened in the past with the Jews. History is just repeating itself. Terrorists and Nazis are the same shit.

              Labeling the Quran burning as a “social experiment” does not make it better. The people involved are not tolerant humanists, who work towards a better future. They simply want to spread their hate.

              • izzent
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                Don’t put words in my mouth. Nowhere did you quote “social experiment” from, because I didn’t fucking say that. If this is how you argue then just leave.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  “Social experiment” was in response to the commenters that claimed that the Quran burning was simply an experiment to expose “the true nature of the religion of peace”.

                  If you don’t share this view, then I am sorry for misrepresenting your opinion. “Social experiment” was not meant to be a quote.

          • izzent
            link
            English
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So, burning books is worse than setting a building on fire, potentially endangering many people’s lives? Wow.

            You sure are an advocate of good and justice, never met someone so righteous and rational before 🙄.

            • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -21 year ago

              Two wrongs dont make a right. And someone beating you up after you insulted him does not make it right for you to have insulted him in the first place.

              That is stuff already taught in kindergarten…

              • izzent
                link
                English
                31 year ago

                Two wrongs? So to you a book is as important as lives then. Move along zealot, the adults are talking.

                • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -21 year ago

                  Nowhere did i say that or imply that. The swedish authorities failed, as they allowed the book burning. That does not make the burning of the embassy right. But justifying the book burning with a false comparision like you do is obviously motivated by your bigotry against muslims.

                  • izzent
                    link
                    English
                    31 year ago

                    Projection from someone who equates books to lives. Again, like I already said. There’s no discourse to be had with a zealot, so move along.

                    You keep telling yourself that burning buildings is fine, I’m sure you’ll enjoy prison.