• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 days ago

    Yeah, I misspoke. I meant “will miss”, we’ve got enough observations that we know the “keyhole event” that was a possibility is no longer a possibility.

    • Singletona082
      link
      English
      23 days ago

      Fair. All jokes and nihilism aside. Someone should take advantage of the flyby to send something up to study it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 days ago

        I think it’s hard to justify since we’ve already done a successful asteroid rendezvous (a few, IIRC) and it’s unclear (to me) what we could learn from studying the surface of this particular one or even studying from the surface of this one.

        If we knew how to move it from solar orbit to terrestrial or lunar orbit and then use it as raw materials, that might be profitable. Or at least a nice engineering challenge on the way to profitable asteroid mining. But, I think the delta-V we’d have to achieve for that might me more than we are capable of right now.

        I do wonder if we could put something on it and use it as part of a measurement tool, like how they can stitch together multiple 'scope sensors? I forget what the name of that is. Differential capture? Diffusion imaging?

        It is an interesting opportunity, we rarely get such close flybys well predicted, but someone closer to the science / smarter than me would have to put together a mission plan.

        • Singletona082
          link
          English
          22 days ago

          Hence my wanting it done. ‘We don’t get close flybies all that often. Make the most of it.’