- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Google’s executives gave details on Wednesday on how the tech giant will sunset its diversity initiatives and defended dropping its pledge against building artificial intelligence for weaponry and surveillance in an all-staff meeting.
Oh it’s simple “we’ve hired too many employees. Instead of laying people off we’ll treat everyone like shit until enough people leave to meet our goals”.
But the math says that treating those employees well will still get you more money.
The problem is that it won’t necessarily happen this quarter.
It’s all about motivations. Are they motivated first by the performance of the business, or by class warfare? Only the latter adequately explains observed behavior.
None of the executives are motivated first by class warfare. They’re motivated by short term share value increases - which invariably causes the kind of pains which pushes everyone towards class warfare, IMO.
Some, not all. CEOs are people (sorta) with their own flaws and prejudices. Elon is, I believe, a clear example of a billionaire putting class warfare first. That would match his behavior perfectly.
Good point and poignant counterexample, i admit
Personally i’d like them to drown in talent that gets to pull down a paycheque for doing fuck all. Actions, consequences, github wins in the end