• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    714 hours ago

    This is a good argument for self-hosting Forgejo (which is quite simple compared to gitlab from what I hear).

    But good to see they are standing up to this shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1413 hours ago

      Self hosting git repos can be super minimal. If you don’t have a lot of users or repos, just use ssh. Hell you can host a repo on a local SMB network share eben.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 hours ago

        Yes it’s trivial to host a repo, and then you have achieved approximately 2% of a forge.

      • runeko
        link
        fedilink
        412 hours ago

        I wish I could upvote this a hundred times.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 hours ago

          If you’re not stuck on git, give fossil a try. It’s a distributed source code version control with an integrated bug tracker, wiki, forum, and more. All that in in one 3 MB sized binary.

          It can even mirror to GitHub and export/import git repositories.

          It’s very easy to host yourself.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 hours ago

      So much simpler than gitlab. An executable and a single config file. That’s all there is if you use sqlite as the database.

      Gitlab was a farmyard of different things to worry about.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Traditional server-based self-hosting will have lower average uptime, will be easier to attack, and will have a much higher chance of disappearing out of nowhere (bus factor event, or for any other reason).

      A decentralized or distributed solution would make more sense as a suggestion here. Radicale (this one) is such an effort I’m aware of, although I never tried it myself or take a look at its architecture.