After like 80 years you probably think you’re safe.

  • @streetman
    link
    English
    89
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Article can be found here

    It’s a bit misleading and the tests were performed in 2019 to a disputed shawl owned by the suspect. This wouldn’t hold up in modern court let alone Victorian age court.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      295 days ago

      Just to be pedantic, the “let alone” turn of phrase is meant to imply that the second thing has a higher standard. So in this case it should be corrected to “this wouldn’t hold up in a Victorian age court, let alone a modern one.”

      • Kate-ay
        link
        105 days ago

        I think they mean the standards were lower in Victorian times.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          75 days ago

          yes we can make an assumption that that is indeed what they think, but that’s not actually what they said with the sentence “This wouldn’t hold up in modern court let alone Victorian age court”. So perhaps they accidentally used incorrect phrasing, but even so, the logic doesn’t follow - if something doesn’t hold up in modern-day court, that tells us nothing about whether or not it would hold up in Victorian times, when standards of evidence were indeed lower.