• @daniskarma
    link
    English
    312 years ago

    We need a Google successor.

    Something non-profit.

    • @dx1
      link
      English
      19
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The horrible reality is that Bing has actually become a competitor to Google, simply by Google getting worse and worse. Microsoft used to be the main bad guy, but these days they practically seem benign compared to the others. Not open source like you’re saying, of course.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        The ai generated top reply on Bing pisses me off 90% of the time. Word salad with citations.

        • @ArcticCircleSystem
          link
          English
          12 years ago

          Often citations for fake books or rare print material the AI couldn’t possibly have had access to. ~Cherri

    • themeatbridge
      link
      English
      102 years ago

      The infrastructure to crawl, store, and serve search results to billions of users is phenomenally expensive. A government might fund it (which comes with its own concerns), but a non-profit will struggle to compete.

        • @ArcticCircleSystem
          link
          English
          22 years ago

          If you’re talking about YaCY, apparently that’s pretty much useless right now from what I’ve heard. ~Cherri

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            There’s actually a lot of theory and early work out there on the topic of federated search. While existing search aggregators like Searx and YaCY certainly qualify as federated, search infrastructure built from the ground up with decentralization in mind would look very different.

      • 33KK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        When you factor out all the garbage content it’s suddebly affordable lol

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Wikipedia probably has the resources to do it, wikisearch. Somebody talk them into it. But yeah, modern search engines, pretty amazing the ones from two decades ago actually worked better.

    • @Chocrates
      link
      English
      42 years ago

      This could be interesting. The infrastructure required to scrape the internet though is going to be so daunting. Google got to build it up slowly as the internet got bigger. Bing is backed by a huge corporation that already has data centers. A new non profit player is going to take a huge coordinated effort.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        I know P2P had become a dead buzzword, but what if people dedicated a portion of their computers to assisting an open search engine.

        I would wait 30s for accurate results. It could also piggyback on a search aggregator.

        • @Chocrates
          link
          English
          22 years ago

          There used to be an open source search aggregator, don’t remember what it was called

          • @ArcticCircleSystem
            link
            English
            22 years ago

            I think it was YaCY, but apparently it’s basically useless for everyday use. ~Cherri

            • @Chocrates
              link
              English
              12 years ago

              Yeah that looks like it! Why do you say it is useless? I have cloud credits that I could theoretically burn hosting one of these

              • @ArcticCircleSystem
                link
                English
                12 years ago

                IIRC its results just aren’t that good? I haven’t tried it, this is just what I’ve heard. Maybe it’s gotten better? ~Cherri

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Yacy exists but it’s bad enough that it’s one of the few options I don’t self host.