• @Jarix
      link
      2
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Stop thinking in terms of dollar amounts, think in disparities or ratios over minumum wage/poverty line for an economic region/group

      Figure out what our actual acceptable limit is and keep it there despite number of units as that will just need to be continually adjusted

      Edit: crap not who i meant to reply to. Still applies though so ill leave the comment

      • @Olhonestjim
        link
        1416 hours ago

        Honestly 50 million is plenty for any individual.

      • @RaoulDook
        link
        English
        616 hours ago

        Right, I would say the limit should be “no billionaires” so that if your net worth including investments exceeds $999M then you have to sell off some property or give money to the taxman until you are under $1b net worth. $999 million is still more money than anyone would ever need but just having no billionaires would be a great start.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 hours ago

          I’d say make a progressive scale such that 1 billion is the theoretical limit, meaning you would need infinite gross/pre-tax wealth to exceed 1 billion in net wealth after taxes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          515 hours ago

          That’s still probably too high, but its a number nobody can object-to. Would be easy to pass that law in a democracy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Even 1 billion works. You have to make it high still, or everyone will say “bu-bu-but that’s communism”

    • Franklin
      link
      215 hours ago

      put that limit at 100 million please