In the past week or so, the courts have begun to try to set some boundaries on the Musk–Miller–Trump administration’s early blitz of recklessness.

. . .

This judicial review provides at least a small reprieve, hope that some of the administration’s most destructive impulses will be stopped. Or at least pared back. But even with the courts stepping up, and even with the reality of the administration’s ineptitude sinking in, this early Musk–Miller–Trump blitz remains very—maybe irreparably—damaging. Of course, there are a lot of moles to whack: the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are being dismantled at an alarming rate, and the court system is not known for being nimble. The administration is betting, perhaps rightly, that at least some of its thoughtless, lawless efforts will slip through the cracks.

But even if the courts caught them all—and even if every court facing each lawless escapade said, “Nope, that’s not a thing”—still the entire process would be doing serious damage to our institutions. Think of it as someone spoofing your identity and going on a shopping spree with your credit cards. Even if the goon gets caught, you still have to go store by store to argue that the fraudulent purchase wasn’t legitimate and hope the debt is forgiven. And all the while, perhaps long after all the debts are dealt with, the torrent of uncertainty kills your credit score.

MBFC
Archive

  • @nwilz
    link
    06 days ago

    Ok my way they wouldn’t pay for it by the threat of violence. I like my way better

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The reason it’s done through “threat of violence” (this is a good indicator that you shouldn’t be taken seriously) is that libertarian pipedreams are bullshit that never work.

      Your way is idiotic and leads to people being poisoned by bad actors and is the reason we do it through taxes in the first place.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        26 days ago

        Right now, they’re at the “loose nuclear weapons are a good thing” point in their attempt to defend Trump, so I think they’re going even beyond most libertarian pipe dreams.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      16 days ago

      Remember how this started with you saying what Trump is doing right now with firing federal employees is a good thing?

      Still think what he’s doing is good?

      • @nwilz
        link
        06 days ago

        Yes lol nothing you said that would possibly change someone’s mind

        • Flying Squid
          link
          1
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Really? The fact that he fired the people who secure nuclear weapons and monitor other nations’ nuclear weapons doesn’t change your mind? Loose nukes are a good thing?

          Did you even read the article? You didn’t, did you?

          • @nwilz
            link
            16 days ago

            I don’t care what rawstory thinks

            • Flying Squid
              link
              16 days ago

              It’s not an opinion article. It’s a fact. Trump fired people responsible for securing our nuclear weapons.

              So go on, talk about how unsecure nuclear weapons are a good thing.

              • @nwilz
                link
                16 days ago

                Getting rid of those people isn’t evidence that they are insecure. So yes it is an opinion piece

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  16 days ago

                  “Getting rid of the bank guards doesn’t mean it’s easy to rob the bank!” That’s what you’re arguing now.

                  • @nwilz
                    link
                    16 days ago

                    If the bank kept it’s money in the open with only guards protecting it yeah, but that’s not the case