• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    65 days ago

    Which SpaceX subsidies are you referring to? Just the contracts they’re fulfilling for NASA and the DOD?

      • @Professorozone
        link
        75 days ago

        I was wondering the same thing. I wasn’t aware he got subsidies. The article only pinpoints $4.9B, but it’s an old article. Thanks for sharing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        @[email protected]

        The article linked in the post I’m replying to, while from 2015, details $5.9 billion of subsidies that no-one I know approved in forms including tax breaks, century long $1 leasing deal in New York, rebates, and gifted sellable carbon credits.

        This is separate to the $5.5 billion in SpaceTwitter contracts.

        Both numbers, have, I’m sure I don’t need to check any data sets to see have gone up in the 10 years since.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        05 days ago

        Looks like state subsidies, not federal?

        On a smaller scale, SpaceX, Musk’s rocket company, cut a deal for about $20 million in economic development subsidies from Texas to construct a launch facility there.

        Included in the local subsidies is a 15-year property tax break from the local school district worth $3.1 million to SpaceX. O

    • @IncogCyberspaceUser
      link
      45 days ago

      If that’s the case, which I suspect it is, we look really fucking dumb being so hyperbolic(or what would the word be here? I just woke up). Let’s not stoop to their level with nonsense like this, there are plenty of legitimate criticisms to be made.

      • haui
        link
        fedilink
        25 days ago

        The complete opposite is the case. Musk is lying through his teeth. The whole world sees it, just some folks still don’t want to accept it.

        • @IncogCyberspaceUser
          link
          85 days ago

          I’m not sure what you’re trying to say in response to what I said. I’m not denying that Musk lies.
          I’m saying calling money from government contracts for NASA and the likes subsidies is not correct. Unless my definition of subsidies isn’t right and needs expanding.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            15 days ago

            I’d agree that unnecessary contracts are subsidies but then that just pushes your point down the road a little bit. I’d say that maintaining the ISS isn’t unnecessary, for instance.

            • @Argonne
              link
              24 days ago

              Maintaining the ISS is absolutely necessary unless you want brainrot like RFK Jr and have all your best scientists move to Chinas new space station projects. The world is a complicated place, but shunning science and space is not the answer