• @PugJesusOPM
    link
    English
    26 days ago

    Dunno about that. Several of our sources during the Principate are hostile towards Caesar himself, in part due to openly identifying more with his ultraconservative opposition.

    • @wjrii
      link
      English
      46 days ago

      Any examples off the top of your head? I guess I am thinking more of chroniclers and “proto-historians” who would have thrived after Augustus solidified control of the entire state apparatus, but I am legitimately happy to have my horizons broadened.

      • @PugJesusOPM
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I checked to make sure. I remembered Dio as more hostile than he was, though he certainly has some condemnation, he’s on the whole pro-Caesar, while I remembered him as more negative. Suetonius relates positive and negative stories about him, but regards his assassination as just. Plutarch is more in-line with what I was thinking.

        I would’ve sworn to passages in one of Tacitus’s works heavily critical on Caesar, but if they exist, Google is too fucked to give quick access, and I don’t have the energy to paw through all of Tacitus’s works to find a few paragraphs that probably aren’t even the focus of the chapter.

        Maybe I’m thinking of letters rather than histories?

        • @wjrii
          link
          English
          26 days ago

          No worries. I’ve probably got the autobiography more in my mind anyway, and current events have probably biased me on the side of presuming propaganda. 😂

          Still perfectly plausible either way, that ol’ Ivlivs handed the letter over as a pure flex or as CYA and a flex.