@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 5 days agoboo!mander.xyzimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1228arrow-down15
arrow-up1223arrow-down1imageboo!mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 5 days agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish19•4 days agoYeah, it’s strange to label it as “not threatened” when there is a “data deficient” label available. It appears that the “data deficient” label is avoided as much as possible: https://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/science-and-technical/sap244.pdf Page 27
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 days agoCan we please change the subject? I fear our govt (which is trying to drill in nature reserves currently) will gleefully latch onto this!
Yeah, it’s strange to label it as “not threatened” when there is a “data deficient” label available.
It appears that the “data deficient” label is avoided as much as possible:
https://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/science-and-technical/sap244.pdf Page 27
Can we please change the subject? I fear our govt (which is trying to drill in nature reserves currently) will gleefully latch onto this!