Summary

A European Parliament member claimed that the U.S. gave Europe three weeks to agree on Ukraine’s “surrender” terms or risk an American withdrawal from Europe.

Mika Aaltola made the claim on X, but provided no evidence. NBC News reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested a U.S. troop reduction in Europe.

Trump reportedly plans to cut 20,000 troops and demand greater NATO contributions. He has pushed for higher NATO defense spending.

Trump may meet with Putin soon, believing Russia holds the upper hand in negotiations.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They are ramping for WW3 with the world vs USA/Russia/China…

    Holy fuck I feel so sorry for the world.

    Less than half of the US support Trump though, so the US would either be on the side of the World or fighting its own civil war.

    • @Resand
      link
      English
      15
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      About 2/3 of the voting age no?

      1/3 actively voted for him, and 1/3 was “fine with either option”

      • @khannie
        link
        English
        6
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        He didn’t win the >50% of the vote if you count third parties which is interesting enough.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 days ago

        A lot of people don’t vote as a protest. Most stupid shit I ever heard and I instantly lose respect for anyone that doesn’t at least go spoil their ballot.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Nah. Lumping the people who didn’t vote in as supporting trump is stupid.

        (I fully expect most of you to do it, though.)

        Edit for the downvoters: Are you really delusional enough to believe that people who didn’t vote for trump are automatically going to die for him in a war? Lol.

        • @MegaUltraChicken
          link
          English
          142 days ago

          Lumping the people who didn’t vote in as supporting trump is stupid.

          In the context of electoral outcomes, it’s objectively true. Other than that, I think most of us would agree with you.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -202 days ago

            In the context of electoral outcomes, it’s objectively true.

            Not really, but I expect you to be delusional enough to believe it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              It is true. By not opposing fascism, you’re tacitly supporting it.

              They literally published a playbook of what they’d do if they won. The contents of it were known. The man straight up said he would be a dictator.

              Knowing all of that, if you didn’t oppose him, you were complicit in him gaining power.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -7
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                🥱

                The delusion on these forums is palpable.

                “If you don’t vote in an election, you automatically support one candidate over the other!”

                Glad most of it is contained online, though.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 day ago

                  You should look up the definition of tacitly.

                  All that’s required for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing. If you did nothing to prevent Trump, then you are fully on board with what he promised to do when he’s in power.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -2
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    Both are evil, though.

                    Also, why does not voting show support for one side over the other?

                    Why do you always say “If you didn’t vote, you support TRUMP!”?

                    Why not “If you didn’t vote, you support Kamala!”?

                    What’s the determining factor, or are non-voters just people you can blame for whatever you want?

                    then you are fully on board with what he promised to do when he’s in power.

                    This kind of delusion is sad among this generation, but I seriously don’t expect more from you people at this point. I’d be foolish to do so.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  More like

                  “If you don’t vote in an election, you don’t prefer one candidate over the other / oppose one candidate!”

                  Now tell me Harris would’ve been equally bad…

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    22 days ago

                    Harris would’ve been better than trump, but that’s not the boon you may think it is.

                    The problem with biden and harris is they convince the left that a slow loss is winning. It’s not. The disparity in wealth continued to grow under biden, just not as fast as it would have under trump.

                    Until the left can grow some cajones and rescind its rampant consumerism, either politician that wins is a loss for the working class.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Expecting them to defend the USA from Trump is also stupid. They couldn’t even be bothered to vote.

    • Alue42
      link
      fedilink
      12 days ago

      Congressional approval is required for acts of war. I know the Republicans have Congress, but are they willing to go that far??

      • @Resand
        link
        English
        11 day ago

        If you don’t agree 100% with what Trump says you’re an traitor. They probably will, rightly fearing for their lives if they don’t

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 days ago

        I don’t think they’ve actually approved a war since Korea. They ceded that power to the president. Congress never declared war on Vietnam, Iraq x2, or Afghanistan. And that’s just the big ones.

        • Alue42
          link
          fedilink
          22 days ago

          You are incorrect on each of those. Vietnam was approved by Congress with the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (1964). Iraq was approved with the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (2002). Afghanistan was approved by the Congress Joint Resolution (2001).