• @riodoro1
    link
    52 days ago

    MelodiousFunk does have a point. Shooting him is cheaper.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 day ago

        Just hogtie him and leave him on the lauch pad. We get rid of a problem, and the problem is turned into mostly it’s component atoms. Give giving the circle of life a little help!

      • @AngryCommieKender
        link
        5
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Trebuchet? Cheap? ✅. Easily assembled and transported? ✅. Low tech not needed any rare earth materials? ✅. Sufficient to launch him at least 150 m? ✅. Low survivability rate for potential additional yeeting? ✅.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 day ago

          Hmm, I think we shouldn’t rule out other simple machines with wooden frames and French names just yet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 days ago

        To be clear, I am not advocating for shooting Musk. I am saying we can ignite a fraction of the rocket fuel without any of the containment vessels or expensive infrastructure. While there will be no liftoff, it would certainly be uplifting.