I’d like to thank everyone for my most upvoted post on lemmy ever. Not only have you upvoted it to the top for like 2 days you commented the shit out of it. I’d like to take this opportunity to say fuck the mods of this instance. This was my second post coming off a 30 day ban and I want to say these fucking mods have been nothing but bitches. I’ve never been more attacked on any other instance, subreddit, forum, etc. then I have been in this fucking instance. Not only have I been attacked I’ve been told my memes arent memey enough again and again.

I’ll be honest, I do not know how to make a meme but I keep posting just to piss in these mods cheerios.

Thanks lemmy.world/politicalmemes for being the worst community I’ve ever been a part of.

    • @PugJesus
      link
      English
      192 days ago

      Revolutions don’t happen because there’s too much suffering. Revolutions happen when people think there’s no other way to force change, and when they think they can win.

      It will get worse domestically. But this will not contribute to any uprising. In fact, it very likely will make it harder.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 day ago

        If you look at the French revolution, sure, there was suffering.

        But look at who took over when the revolution had taken the heads of the monarchy. Was it the peasants who had waved pitchforks? Was it bollocks. It was a bunch of nobles who were sick of their lot under the old regime.

        Revolutions happen when wannabe new leaders instigate them. Hordes of angry people are a force to be reckoned with, but without leaders they ain’t organising shit. They’re a tool for takeovers.

        • @PugJesus
          link
          English
          91 day ago

          The bourgeoisie, rather than nobility, and the peasants were largely reactionaries; it was the urban proletariat which provided the enthusiastic manpower of the Revolution.

          But yes, I agree. Organization and leaders make revolutions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 day ago

        Revolutions don’t happen because there’s too much suffering

        That’s because the people in charge (historically speaking) have made sure that not enough universal suffering happens to create a revolution. This administration is a new kind of special, and I wouldn’t count it out.

        • @PugJesus
          link
          English
          81 day ago

          That’s because the people in charge (historically speaking) have made sure that not enough universal suffering happens to create a revolution.

          Bruh, I can point you to some very universally-suffering societies, both modern and historical, which did not provoke revolutions; and every revolution I can think of was very far from universally suffering, compared to prior or later conditions.

          Suffering is only marginally related to revolution, at best.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -3
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            both modern and historical, which did not provoke revolutions; and every revolution I can think of was very far from universally suffering, compared to prior or later conditions.

            Suffering is only marginally related to revolution, at best.

            I’ll make a note that you are an expert in revolutions and move on with my life.

            Edit: just to be clear, not that I really mind downvotes but I’m not being sarcastic and I’m not going toe to toe with somebody who is well versed in something that I am not I am clearly out of my depth. And I have not downloaded OP.

            • @PugJesus
              link
              English
              51 day ago

              I’ll make a note that you are an expert in revolutions and move on with my life.

              There are quite a number of revolutions in history, which is my field, yes.

    • Therobohour
      link
      142 days ago

      May I ask,what would be that thing? Because its seems like your all well over due for a bit of a revolution

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        452 days ago

        People are seemingly waiting for “the thing” not realizing that there’s never “the thing” in a successive authoritarian takeover.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 day ago

          I think most people thought that “the” line was crossed at some point several lines ago, but when there wasn’t an obvious consensus that “the” line had been crossed at that particular time, people kept looking around and waiting for others to say that “the” line had been crossed. That’s how we’ve all allowed it to get to such an insane point. We’re all waiting for a revolutionary instead of being the leader we need. I don’t think any of us feels qualified and capable.

          • Therobohour
            link
            414 hours ago

            Yes but it’s bluntly obvious that no one in capital hill is actually qualified. In fact I would say they’re extremely unqualified. Remember the BLM protests? When nothing changed, well you all need to get to working out that line and get out and do something. 50501

      • @andros_rex
        link
        142 days ago

        The people who don’t care/understand politics will have to get hungry.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 day ago

        over due for a bit of a revolution

        Ohh indeed.

        Here’s the playfield:

        We have cities full of poorly armed people who are on the edge of readiness. Then, we have thousands of miles of rural country with a sparse number of well-armed people who are quite happy with the turn of events.

        Nearly all news coverage is now directly/indirectly state-controlled. Nearly all social media coverage is directly/indirectly state-controlled.

        We’re seeing protests come up around government buildings, but it’s barely a pittance.

        The people who would need to start the coup are poorly armed and largely reluctant to be violent; they’re also not ready to give their lives for the cause. The people who are against any form of coup are well-armed and would LOVE to go in guns blazing.

        The inklings of resistance are present. They’d need someone to organize and lead them,

        Another concern I have is, historically, you have a coup, the military is called in to take it out, they refuse, and a new government is installed with their blessing. What happens when, instead of the military getting called in and refusing, the old government hires private industry to put guns on drones and starts murderbotting protestors? Tech isn’t like it used to be. They don’t need to get their hands directly dirty anymore or risk any of their own lives.

        I’m not certain you could have a revolution against well funded oligarchs dug into a country.

        • Therobohour
          link
          414 hours ago

          Well kid,now is not the time to give up, no matter how dig in they think they are,the tick can always be pulled out