Summary

Trump is pushing for softer language on Russia’s war in Ukraine, straining G7 unity.

Officials say the U.S. is blocking references to “Russian aggression” and prefers calling it the “Ukraine conflict.”

This shift follows Trump’s peace talks with Putin that excluded Ukraine’s President Zelensky, whom Trump later called a “dictator.”

The change in rhetoric contrasts with Biden-era support for Ukraine and threatens a unified G7 stance.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart
    link
    English
    218 hours ago

    Hey there’s no need to be getting personal just because you don’t agree with me.

    Not voting means you support whoever wins, that’s all I’m saying.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      118 hours ago

      I’m not being personal, I’m simply stating that insisting to push that agenda makes you a supporter of oligarchy. Attacking non-voters won’t make them want to vote more, it makes them disassociate even more from politics, which is exactly what the oligarchs want, so you can go ahead and prove your support for Trump’s takeover by continuing to help his cause.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart
        link
        English
        217 hours ago

        Non voters aren’t worth going after.

        The liberals will still keep voting so the DNC should ignore the left that have already abandoned them and go after the moderate right instead.

        At least they consistently vote.

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart
            link
            English
            213 hours ago

            The liberal candidate barely lost while the progressive candidate didn’t even get a million votes.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              212 hours ago

              What progressive candidate? I didn’t know the Dems even considered a progressive candidate?

              Oh, did you mean Jill Stein? So you consider her a progressive candidate now? What happened to all the Dems calling her a Russian asset?

              Funny how people like you count her as a progressive candidate when you want to attack progressives, but dismiss her completely whenever people are talking about alternatives to Kamala.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                link
                English
                19 hours ago

                Would you rather talk about Rachele Fruit from the Socialist Workers Party’s total of 4,225 votes?

                She only needed 77,298,355 more votes to beat Trump!

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  28 hours ago

                  Then, would you rather talk about first past the post and how even with that help, the Democrats can’t even beat an idiot like Trump? Why would you think that there are that many people who would vote for a third party that will never win anything vs the DNC if they had been bothered to listen to their support base? The Democrats only have themselves to blame for losing the election.