So earlier today, the Daily Beast’s Isabel van Brugen published a bombshell story about allegations by Kazakh Spy Chief Alnur Mussayev that the KGB had recruited Donald Trump as a Soviet Asset way back in 1987 under the code name “Krasnov.” I expected...
It has enough predictive power to be useful: if Trump were a wholly owned Russian asset, what would he do? In every single case, using that hypothesis, that’s what he has actually done. So his motive is irrelevant, how much he’s aware of his being a Russian stooge is irrelevant, but his actions are, and will continue to be, painfully fucking relevant.
It has enough predictive power to be useful: if Trump were a wholly owned Russian asset, what would he do? In every single case, using that hypothesis, that’s what he has actually done. So his motive is irrelevant, how much he’s aware of his being a Russian stooge is irrelevant, but his actions are, and will continue to be, painfully fucking relevant.
We have tons of evidence that Trump is working with or for Russia. How does an unverified allegation change anything?