@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 day agocheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1844arrow-down117
arrow-up1827arrow-down1imagecheck it before you wreck itmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 day agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-square@AqariuslinkEnglish2•11 hours agoI agree. Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•9 hours agoI mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties. Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution. You can have both.
I agree.
Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
I mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties.
Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution.
You can have both.