I have seen some people complaining about it, but I think its useful.

  • Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    119 hours ago

    That’s like, all of Lemmy. What are you expecting?

    • Tippon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      219 hours ago

      It’s not though, is it? You’re replying to a question post here, in a community for questions. A significant portion of Lemmy is communities for questions, media, memes, and tech conversations.

      Of the posts that share links, a decent number of those are either posted with a summary to encourage discussion, or are at least posted by a human that you can speak to. A headline and link to another site, posted by a bot, does nothing to encourage interaction with Lemmy. It’s literally a link that points to content somewhere else

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Okay I was being hyperbolic. The vast majority of Lemmy is links.

        The linked content itself drives engagement.

        The point of posting it on Lemmy is to surface interesting content via community votes and drive discussion.

        • Tippon
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 minutes ago

          But that’s my point. A bot that posts links to external content isn’t driving engagement or fostering discussion, it’s just sending people to other sites. Even a brief summary of the link would be better, as it gives you a starting point.

          A plain link is pointless, other than posting for the sake of it and claiming that it’s content. Browsing All and seeing post after post of links with no discussions is just depressing, and doesn’t make me want to stick around, and especially not have conversations with bots.