• Umbra
    link
    fedilink
    -411 year ago

    Both parties are gerrymandering as much as they can get away with. If you meant the electoral college that’s part of being a federation of states, sorry. Changing the rules to benefit your team is not exactly fair either, right?

    • squiblet
      link
      fedilink
      251 year ago

      If the number of electors was distributed in a way that didn’t give disproportional representation to states with very small populations, that would be great. Also, the notion that the US is truly a federation of independent states hasn’t been accurate for at least 200 years.

      • Umbra
        link
        fedilink
        -251 year ago

        It’s a bit disproportional for a few states but then again, you can say the votes of people in Wyoming are worth more relatively speaking but it’s still just 3 electors in the end. No one will pay much attention to them either way, unlike the more populous states which can swing elections.

        • @AbidanYre
          link
          161 year ago

          unlike the more populous states which can swing elections.

          You say that like it’s a bad thing for people to be in charge rather than arbitrary lines drawn on maps.

          • Umbra
            link
            fedilink
            -111 year ago

            I’m saying they don’t matter with their 3 votes, I don’t think the people there feel very important in deciding the presidential election.

        • squiblet
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          It is not just Wyoming, but many states. States like Wyoming and North Dakota get 2-3 times the votes per population as states like California, Florida or Illinois. For states such as New Mexico and Arkansas, the ratio is more like 1.5 times the more populous states. It just doesn’t make sense according to how the system is supposed to work.

    • @shortgiraffe
      link
      16
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Some people’s vote being worth more is not exactly fair. Having equal representation isn’t changing the rules to be in favor of one side, unless you count democracy as a “side”.

    • SSUPII
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      One party wants to directly fuck with your life removing things people have found a need for, the other is slow. Pick your poison I guess.

    • @rambaroo
      link
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, that’s a straight up lie. Multiple blue states have independent commissions that draw the maps, meanwhile red states refuse to allow even that.

      I’m sick of fascists trying to gaslight people into believing that everyone is the same as they are. You’re a blatant liar.

      • @orphiebaby
        link
        51 year ago

        Both candy bars are underrated though :3

        • Raging LibTarg
          link
          41 year ago

          Both candy bars are underrated though

          I’ll die on this hill with you.

    • @Saneless
      link
      -51 year ago

      Fuck the teams. What’s my team? I’m an independent. I’ve never once been registered in a party in my decades of voting. Knock off the team bullshit. It’s how idiots think

      It would be nice if 40-45% of the country didn’t try to force the other 60% to live by their rules.

      • @rambaroo
        link
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lol you’re only an independent because it inflates your ego. You actually think you’re smarter than everyone else. You even say as much. It has fuck all to do with your political views or any desire to make the country a better place.

        • @Saneless
          link
          01 year ago

          I’m an independent because I will vote for whoever makes sense. I never vote party line and I never vote for only one party consistently. If I’m calling people stupid it’s because they think aligning with a party no matter what makes sense. It doesn’t. It’s rigid and ignorant. So yeah, I’m smarter than people like that

          Just lately, republicans have become so toxic and stupid, I wouldn’t dare vote that way. It’s objectively terrible

      • @orphiebaby
        link
        41 year ago

        We need and deserve ranked-choice voting.

        • @Saneless
          link
          31 year ago

          And for that to happen we need the current gatekeepers to allow the change. There’s no incentive for them to ever do what voters want or need

      • Umbra
        link
        fedilink
        -101 year ago

        Would be nice if the majority doesn’t force the minority to live by their rules either.

        • @rambaroo
          link
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So instead you allow a crazy ass minority most people don’t agree with to do the same thing. How convenient for you.