Especially for the less tech-savvy among us?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      213 hours ago

      Briar doesn’t make sense to me because you’re trading a central server for a central service… If tor is down, you can’t message. It’s the same POF as cellular, which is insane to me.

      • @FauxLiving
        link
        210 hours ago

        TOR isn’t a centralized service, it’s a distributed network.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 hours ago

          It’s also a specific procol, which can absolutely be blocked. I don’t know where this notion that it’s impossible to block tor because it was designed to be censorship resistant came from, but you can absolutely stop people from using it.

          It’s not even that hard and there’s nothing end users can do about it if they don’t know how to circumvent it…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 hours ago

            It can be blocked, but blocking bridges is a constant whack-a-mole (especially now that they have Webtunnel which, while apparently not as robust as some dedicated obfuscation solutions, is still a noticeable improvement). My bigger problem with Briar is that both recipients have to be online to message, or you have to set up a “mailbox”.

          • @FauxLiving
            link
            19 hours ago

            Being able to be blocked is a completely different thing than being centralized service.

            […] there’s nothing end users can do about it if they don’t know how to circumvent it…

            I mean, if users don’t know how to circumvent something, by definition there is nothing that they can do about it.

            However, unless this hypothetical censoring country is blocking all encrypted network traffic it is trivial to access TOR via a VPN or an SSH tunnel